• ChesReport (current)
  • Marine Invasions Lab
  • Partner Portals
    Nemesis California Panama Galapagos Cocos Island NP JTMD
    Archived Projects
    Chesapeake
  • Browse Species
    Taxonomic Groups All Species
  • News
  • login
You are viewing an archived site. The Chesapeake Bay Introduced Species Database project ended in 2020 and the database is no longer receiving updates. Learn more…
Image of Loxosomatoides laevis

Loxosomatoides laevis

Entoprocts

kamptozoan

What the heck is a Kamptozoan? Kamptozoans are members of the phylum Entoprocta, which means "anus inside". This is a group of small (0.1 to 7mm, < inch) sessile (attached to a substrate) aquatic animals that use a crown of solid tentacles to filter feed. This species, Loxosomatoides laevis, is so small it can only be seen with a microscope (maximum size 0.98mm, 0.03in). It is the shape of a wineglass, with a thin stock and cup rimmed with feeding tentacles. Inside the cup are both the mouth and anus. This species was first described in India in 1915 and later in Japan (1951) and is considered native to those regions. SERC researchers discovered it in Chesapeake Bay in 1994 in both the upper and lower Bay. Because it is so small we don’t know when it arrived, but it wasn’t found in surveys done in the 1940s.

Image Credit: Ruiz laboratory

Taxonomy Invasion History Ecology Impacts References

Description


Taxonomy

Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family Genus
Animalia Entoprocta (Kamptozoa) None Coloniales Pedicellinidae Loxosomatoides

Synonyms

Loxosomatoides japonicum

Invasion History

Chesapeake Bay Status

First Record Population Range Introduction Residency Source Region Native Region Vectors
1994 Established Expanding Introduced Regular Resident Western Pacific Western Pacific Shipping(Fouling Community)

History of Spread

Loxosomatoides laevis kamptozoan (or entoproct ) was described from Chilka Lake, an estuary of the Bay of Bengal, India, in 1915, and found in Japan in 1951. All but one of the other members of the genus are confined to Asian waters; one South American species may belong to another genus (Wasson et al. 2000). It was not collected in early studies of entoprocts in the Chesapeake Bay (Osburn 1944) or other East Coast sites (Woods Hole MA, NC, SC) (Wasson et al. 2000).

Loxosomatoides laevis' only known occurrences outside the Indo-Pacific have been in Chesapeake Bay, where it was first identified on the Smithsonian Envrionmental Research Center Marine Invasions Program settling plates in 1994, in sites in upper and lower Chesapeake Bay. In 1994-1997, it was collected in the Chester River (MD), Baltimore Harbor; the Rhode River and West Rivers (MD); and Norfolk Harbor VA (Wasson et al. 2000).

History References- Osburn 1944; Wasson et al. 2000; Ruiz et al. unpublished data

Invasion Comments

Ecology

Environmental Tolerances

For SurvivalFor Reproduction
Minimum Maximum Minimum Maximum
Temperature (ºC) 32.0
Salinity (‰) 5.0 28.0
Oxygen
pH
Salinity Range meso-poly

Age and Growth

Male Female
Minimum Adult Size (mm) 0.6 0.6
Typical Adult Size (mm) 0.8 0.8
Maximum Adult Size (mm) 1.0 1.0
Maximum Longevity (yrs)
Typical Longevity (yrs

Reproduction

Start Peak End
Reproductive Season
Typical Number of Young
Per Reproductive Event
Sexuality Mode(s)
Mode(s) of Asexual
Reproduction
Fertilization Type(s)
More than One Reproduction
Event per Year
Reproductive Startegy
Egg/Seed Form

Impacts

Economic Impacts in Chesapeake Bay

Although it is an abundant fouling organism in Chesapeake Bay, because of its small size, the kamptozoan Loxosomatoides laevis has no economic importance in the Chesapeake Bay region.


Economic Impacts Outside of Chesapeake Bay

Although it is an abundant fouling organism in Chesapeake Bay, because of its small size, the kamptozoan Loxosomatoides laevis has no economic importance in its known range.


Ecological Impacts on Chesapeake Native Species

Effects of Loxosomatoides laevis on native biota are unknown for Chesapeake Bay and elsewhere. However, it is striking that during the SERC Invasions Group settling plate surveys, none of the native entoproct species reported by Osburn (1944) from the Bay were found. Many of his collections were made in Atlantic Coastal bays, where setling plates have not been deployed. However, it is possible that the native species have been replaced by the introduced entoprocts.

References- Ruiz et al. unpublished; Wasson 1997; Wasson et al. 2000


Ecological Impacts on Other Chesapeake Non-Native Species

Effects of Loxosomatoides laevis on introduced biota are unknown for Chesapeake Bay and elsewhere.


References

Barnes, Robert D. (1983) Invertebrate Zoology., , Philadelphia. Pp. 883

Cohen, Andrew N.; Carlton, James T. (1995) Nonindigenous aquatic species in a United States estuary: a case study of the biological invasions of the San Francisco Bay and Delta, , Washington DC, Silver Spring MD.. Pp.

Osburn, Raymond C. (1944) A survey of the Bryozoa of Chesapeake Bay, Chesapeake Biological Laboratory Publications 63: 1-55

Wasson, Kerstin (1997) Systematic revision of colonial kamptozoans (entoprocts) of the Pacific coast of North America, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 121: 1-63

Wasson, Kerstin; Toft, Jason; Von Holle, Betsy; Ruiz, Gregory (2000) Detecting invasions of marine organisms: kamptozoan case histories., Biological Invasions 2: 59-74


Direct questions and comments to chesnemo@si.edu.

©